Message-ID: <24342172.1075853243587.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: alan.comnes@enron.com
To: gfergus@brobeck.com, tim.belden@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, 
	james.steffes@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, 
	jeff.dasovich@enron.com, tim.heizenrader@enron.com, 
	paul.kaufman@enron.com, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, 
	richard.sanders@enron.com
Subject: ISO's Response to BPA Rebuttal of Sheffrin Study--Confidential Atty
 Client work product
Cc: ray.alvarez@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: ray.alvarez@enron.com
X-From: Alan Comnes
X-To: gfergus@brobeck.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Tim Belden, Susan J Mara, James D Steffes, Mark Palmer, Jeff Dasovich, Tim Heizenrader, Paul Kaufman, rcarroll@bracepatt.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Richard B Sanders
X-cc: Ray Alvarez
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

I recommend reading CAISO's response.  This letter was reported in last 
week's trade press.

I am told that BPA does not consider this letter confidential even though it 
is labeled as such by CAISO.

Many of the  CAISO "backpedal" statements made re: claims of strategic 
bidding would apply equally to other importers.

Alan Comnes
